Sarai’s conditions betray a resistance to just accept the truth that Jesus sovereignly stopped their away from which have a guy: “Today behold the father have prevented me chatki login from influence pupils. Please come in back at my maid; possibly I am going to see children as a consequence of the lady” (Genesis 16:2).
This is the sin regarding presumption. Failing to trust God to incorporate a son, she forced the trouble of the forcing Abram toward getting Hagar while the his partner.
Unusually, the nice commentator, Leupold, attempts to disappear Sarai’s guilt of the worrying their trust on the hope off God 160 and her care about-give up when you look at the offering Hagar so you can this lady partner. 161 I do not agree with both need. Nowhere will there be any term off trust on the guarantee regarding Genesis a dozen:1-3.
It looks if you ask me one she wished to get rid of the public stigma regarding barrenness, and to reinforce the matchmaking giving a boy so you’re able to Abram, regardless of if they in it the newest lose from concept
When you’re monogamy might not be demonstrably demanded, it had been demonstrated due to the fact what was brand-new and you can greatest (Genesis dos:18-25). The first regard to polygamy is actually away from free (cf. Genesis cuatro:19ff.). Next in the publication several girlfriend is obviously followed by conflict and battle (cf. Genesis ff.).
Within my quote Sarai did not operate when you look at the faith, however in assumption. This lady top concern seems to be on the social stigma upon this lady barrenness. She offered for the. Trust never tries to push Jesus to act, neither to do something for the God’s set, nor to accomplish what’s supernatural about stamina of skin.
Is actually she asking for support out of God’s like and unlimited electricity?
We have been difficult on Sarai. Particular might imagine way too hard. However, when you are Sarai try the newest instigator associated with debacle, Abram is at fault, as well as. In reality, in a few suggests which sin should be traced returning to Abram’s unbelief, when he leftover Canaan and you will transpired in order to Egypt (Genesis -13:4). Is-it mere coincidence one to Hagar are Egyptian?
Now Sarai, Abram’s wife got borne your no college students, and she got a keen Egyptian maid whoever identity is actually Hagar (Genesis sixteen:1).
The probability is great one Hagar try something special out-of Pharaoh so you can Abram, a part of the brand new dowry getting Sarai: “Hence he managed Abram well on her behalf sake; and gave your sheep and oxen and donkeys and male and you may people servants and people donkeys and you can camels” (Genesis ).
This new birds constantly get back so you can roost. I do believe you to Hagar is actually among the outcomes of Abram’s failure off trust when you look at the part 12. When you find yourself Sarai might have been the latest prodder when you look at the part sixteen, the latest offer was only you can easily, through Abram’s decision so you can sojourn for the Egypt.
From inside the part sixteen Abram is much more from a beneficial pushover than simply a great patriarch. His wife never said God and/or covenant He had made which have Abram. Believe failed to seem to be something, neither is actually God’s will ever sought for. Exactly what a period having Abram to face agency, but rather he fizzled. Seemingly with little or no protest, the guy passively observed the directions off their spouse. She wanted an enthusiastic heir. She structured the honeymoon. Abram performed as he is actually told.
‘Abram heard his wife,’ we’re told (16:2). Listen in the outdated Testament is oftentimes a word to own behavior. Abram’s failure wasn’t in listening, but in heeding her information instead consider their implications. I doubt that Abram really performed ‘listen’ in the same manner regarding gripping exactly what Sarai was trying to state. Performed she should be reminded out-of God’s pledge? Did she want to Abram to make their down? Abram may have obeyed rather than most reading just what Sarai is actually trying to say.